The one with the McSolutions

Earlier this year I spent a fabulous afternoon at the RAF Museum at Hendon. It’s a real boy’s day out – lots of aircraft from the earliest bi-planes to the the Eurofighter. One wall of the first hall you enter is a display representing the first 100 years of flight.

Having walked up and down it a few times the conversation got the observation that somewhere around the early 70s everything started to look the same. The divergent design and engineering of the early pioneers had been replaced by corporate cloning and telling an Airbus from a Boeing requires far too much frequent flying. From our estimations it happened somewhere around here:

Fast forward many months and I was sat with the inimitable Neil Morrison discussing the tribulations of trying to source providers for learning and it’s the reflection of these two events that has lead to this post.

When I thought about it everything since the late 60s/early 70s has become far more generic – whether it be retailers, clothes, cars, household appliances, hotels, etc. You only have to look at the ‘new’ format of the HMV stores to see how someone does something new and novel (Apple in this case) and people jump on the band wagon of the next big thing.

I’m the first to admit there’s safety in knowing what you’re getting – in fact after a particular nasty bug I caught in China the comfort of McDonalds was the only thing my brain/stomach could face but the conformity surely doesn’t have to extend to everything and it leads me to a question…

Have most of us lost the inclination to be individual and act independently from the crowd?

When you move this into a work setting you would only have to read my e-mail for about 72 hours to see several examples of people telling me they have exactly what I need (without even asking me) and most of those people have never met me, don’t really understand my role and for the person who told me he could solve our sales training needs – really don’t understand our organisation.What’s more what they are offering isn’t different, it doesn’t distinguish itself and definitely doesn’t give me the inclination to pick up the phone.

I asked one of my team for some feedback on a meeting with a potential supplier he’d had last week and he replied with genuine surprise “it was different from normal, they actually asked about what we needed and didn’t just tell me what they could do for us”.

I realise in my own work I am guilt, at times, of trying to offer a solution before understanding the problem, but I try to catch myself and thankfully I work with people who are more than comfortable to push back – which is a good thing (most of the time).

I realise also that people who develop the solutions to ‘our’ problems are caught in the trap of firstly, needing to demonstrate coherent examples of interventions and products that have they have deployed before and secondly needing to offer a cost effective solution that doesn’t involve a drawing board for every problem but there has to be a balance between the drawing board and the production line, surely?

Maybe this isn’t a problem of product/solution at all, maybe this is all about sales technique – making the customer (me) feel they are getting something bespoke without actually making the internal investment or requiring client investment every time.

Maybe this is about working with people who make you feel that the burger they are selling you was hand crafted just as you want it by a fully trained chef rather than off the rack in a paper box and whatever the business analogy for “do you want fries with that?” is I’ll let you know after the next few days e-mails…



Filed under Uncategorized

2 responses to “The one with the McSolutions

  1. Matt

    Finding the balance between cost effectiveness and customisation of solutions can come down to the level of experience of those implementing the changes, one size does not fit all. However if a salesman can sell you a bespoke sales training package that is in fact, not bespoke and gives the illusion of ‘bespokeness’, then I guess that is a good sign?

  2. I can’t help feeling this all about the conversation and the relationship building intent behind it. Isn’t that where our uniqueness and individuality comes out (for better or worse!)?

    The products/solutions may or may not be novel or innovative but (assuming they are fit for purpose!) what makes them unique is the whole engagement experience.

    Linking back to airplanes, they do all seem largely similar but we know that carriers like Virgin succeed because of the experience they provide.

    Perhaps the question for L&D buyers as well as suppliers is are you looking to create an experience (or even a journey) where you are engaged and treated well or do you just want to get to Knock for £5 ?


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s